stating that
my
letters
were
always
forwarded to the Firm of Fee Rawson & Co Notwithstanding however the repeated answers to the contrary, feeling constrained to assert that there must be more letters for me I again applied by letter under the signature of my firm and succeeded in obtaining another letter from the April mail, accompanied by the enclosed reply to my note
in order to prove that the irregularities and certain deliveries of my letters, as well as those of my friends, in order to excuse made that the errors arose from want of knowledge of my residence, must have been unfounded, and that having done my part in acquainting the Postmaster with it, I have good cause for complaint
These are not, however the only instances of letters having been detained much to my inconvenience, for the Packet was delivered to me only on the 24 May bearing date the 17th May Hongkong Post mark of the 17th month besides other limited delays which but for my absence at Canton would have been noticed more promptly and
compelled to overlook several instances of overcharges upon letters and newspapers,
I trust however, I have enumerated sufficient to prove that my complaints are not frivolous. The detention of the letter for Robt quail from the 28th May until the 7th July has been a most serious inconvenience as well as expense much might have been overlooked and allowances made for the difficulties that I am aware the Postmaster may have
stating that
my
letters
wvere
always
forwarded to the Frum of Fee Rawson V "O Notwithstanding however then repunticd auswers to the contrary, jeeling
to assened that there mist be more letters for me Sogain applied by letter une ter the signature of my firm and succeeded in obtaining another letter from the April mail, accompanied by the enclosed reply to my note
in
or h
devubing
have been thus particular
caddies whether to sup
sypy
the add
my fine.
thre the medium to prove that the
ivugularities
and certain deliveries
of my friends, in order excuse made that the
arole)
from want of kno wave been
kumbuty of my residesice, must have been infounded, and that having dont my part in acquainting the Portinarter will it, I have good cause for complaint
These
These
405
are not, however the only instances
of letters having been detained much
I my
My
vinconvenience, on
Packet was delivered to
only the 24 May
me
the
beaning of the 17th sunne
Hongkong Post muck of the 17th month besides other
MMmmmer ouÍ
limited delays which but
which but for my
Morez
al
absence
at Canton would have been notices more)
the
Same Caute
promptly and
compelled to overlook several instauses of overcharges
upon letters and newspapers,
I trust however, I have emunerated
sufficient to prove
that my complaints
are not frenolous. The detention of the lotter for Fob quail form the 28th May until the 7th Inly has been a most serious
nicowenience -b
mne ad
well as
expence ?
much might have been overlooked and allowances made for the difficult
lties
that Jam
aware the Post marter
may
have
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.